Byte/\Puker wrote:I'm trying to get some 6970 or 6990 for a good price. My current "cracking" system has a 6970 and a 5770.
Watch out on the 6990s. I don't yet support them, and they are apparently very, VERY touchy to support (moreso than standard ATI cards).
Byte/\Puker wrote:I think ATI cards are better for cracking and cheaper as Nvidia cards.
Well, better is a matter of what they're better at. Hashes? Yes. Large numbers of hashes? Not so much. Remaining working with driver updates? Not nearly as good as nVidia.
Byte/\Puker wrote:I'm interested in you 1-8 lenght tableset. What is the price for it? How long would it take to crack ~100 Hashes with a 6970 ?
$500 shipped on a 2TB external drive for NTLM, 100 hashes is on the order of a few hours. Depends on disk speed, mostly - I'm working on some read ahead magic to help improve table search time, which is the bulk of the time right now.
Byte/\Puker wrote:Good luck in your OpenCL implementation
Thanks... nobody implements the OpenCL spec. They just implement what they care about from it. It's always fun developing to an unknown environment - is my code faulty? Is the SDK faulty? Is the compiler faulty? I really don't like OpenCL...
Byte/\Puker wrote:PS: I think in a week I can do the next step in my C++ improving (Then I will learned the basics). What would you recommend? Don't say my english I'm still learning it
Find a project & start in on it. You'll learn as you go.