Loaded 10 hashes
2141636B734704847575E3731FA1F2C4:abcdefgh
259745CB123A52AA2E693AAACCA2DB52:12345678
68365827D79C4F5CC9B52B688495FD51:1q2w3e4r
75CDC1B4CA2CE525EC6BFC33807CE237:8L0nG4M3
828DB2EAEF4A7BDEF9D0AFE526363106:EightChr
8846F7EAEE8FB117AD06BDD830B7586C:password
9744A2961CF74FB031405C0D53156D33:CyptH4ze
C6F1514D5B639CD1BE7EAEE8DDEE7AA4:P@5$w0rD
CCB9E05DE0B37A99A7876FE59BD4813F:!@#$%^&*
real 82m35.069s
user 0m17.750s
sys 1m18.240s
10 hashes entered, it found 9 in one table, so hit rates are right about where I like them.
This is on a quad Fermi box, but the bulk of the time was table search. However, this search was being done on a spindle disk of the "not insanely fast" variety...
http://www.geeks.com/details.asp?invtid ... DW&cat=HDD
I plan to do some tweaking to help performance on RAID arrays, at least under Linux.