Cryptohaze.com

Cracked:

MD5 : A0E5C9D3690049E01E2C387FE15F00A3: '626*933+740*515' 0x3632362A3933332B3734302A353135

(oddball assignment someone had, I sped up the development on the per-position charset support to try and accomplish it)

15 characters. Custom charset for each position.

And where can we download the new version(s)? All I can find on www.cryptohaze.com is version 0.61.

It's not done yet. I just got the MD5 bits working again tonight, and the shorter kernels (len 0-5) don't work yet. Nor does NTLM, MD4, or anything else.

Would Dictionary support be added to the multiforcers eg the ability to possibly perform mutations or create a rule list such as in JTR which is applied to the dictionary during the attack, since a properly applied dict list can be disastrously powerful.

blazer wrote:Would Dictionary support be added to the multiforcers eg the ability to possibly perform mutations or create a rule list such as in JTR which is applied to the dictionary during the attack, since a properly applied dict list can be disastrously powerful.

That's a goal of mine, yes. It will probably be a separate program, as there's very little code shared between a brute forcer & a wordlist mutator except the basic hash functions.

Take a wordlist, run various mutations, prefixes, and suffixes, and see what pops up. I'm hoping to have about 2GB worth of international wordlists to throw at things once I have this running.

IMO, resume is a must. Multi-GPU support would also be up there.

another way of output would be nice.
i mean yeah hex output is nice and all but i'd love to get a simple hash:pass output by option as well
would be nice if you could implement that into v 0.7

the_drag0n wrote:another way of output would be nice.
i mean yeah hex output is nice and all but i'd love to get a simple hash:pass output by option as well
would be nice if you could implement that into v 0.7

I think I can probably get that done. I've been realizing that my output format is particularly difficult to automatically parse. Maybe display that output, but then store [hash]:[password] in the file?

Bitweasil wrote:I think I can probably get that done. I've been realizing that my output format is particularly difficult to automatically parse. Maybe display that output, but then store [hash]:[password] in the file?

that would be great!

the_drag0n wrote:

Bitweasil wrote:I think I can probably get that done. I've been realizing that my output format is particularly difficult to automatically parse. Maybe display that output, but then store [hash]:[password] in the file?

that would be great!

Output using TAB separated columns, please. I've got plenty of passwords using : (or any other character on your keyboard) as part of the password. So please: TAB separated output!

Regards,
mrCracker