Support of LM ?

Discussion and support for the CUDA Multiforcers (Windows and Linux)
  • Ads

Re: Support of LM ?

Postby Rolf » Fri Sep 02, 2011 8:45 am

Bitweasil wrote:Bad news.

Whoa, I'd like some more of those bad news ;)
It's higher than I estimated for my gtx 480, which are clocked at 1.64Ghz shader, so it's gonna be even higher!

What's the trick ?
S-box stuff in shared mem ?

P.S. You pwnt all known CUDA LM crackers - edpr(bitsliced lol) and EGB.
Rolf
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 9:15 pm

Re: Support of LM ?

Postby Bitweasil » Fri Sep 02, 2011 2:57 pm

Rolf wrote:What's the trick ?
S-box stuff in shared mem ?


Yes, pretty much. The code will be open shortly when I clean stuff up, but I'm using Jan's DES implementation from the FRT code, and improved it by moving things from constant memory into shared memory. 4k of shared is used for structures that speed sbox and key generation schedules. There are a few other optimizations I would like to make with regards to the initial permutation or plaintext gen - right now I've got a number of rather inefficient shifts and masks happening that I can mostly eliminate.
Bitweasil
Site Admin
 
Posts: 912
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:26 pm

Re: Support of LM ?

Postby pyr » Tue Sep 06, 2011 6:40 pm

Nice job !

On my GTX260 :
1 hash => 84 M/s
13'000 hashes => 74 M/s
Win 7 x64 + HD 5870
pyr
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 6:32 pm

Previous

Return to CUDA Multiforcers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron